March 3, 2010
"[…] when researchers extract a single food from a diet of proven value, it usually fails to adequately explain why the people living on that diet live longer or have lower rates of heart disease or cancer than people eating a modern Western diet. The whole of a dietary pattern is evidently greater than the sum of its parts. [emphasis added]"

— Pollan, Michael. In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto, Paperback edition, page 178. Penguin Books.

February 24, 2010
"So here, then, is the first momentous change in the Western diet that may explain why it makes some people sick: Supplanting tested relationships to the whole foods with which we coevolved over many thousands of years, it asks our bodies now to relate to, and deal with, a very small handful of efficiently delivered nutrients that have been torn from their food context. Our ancient evolutionary relationship with the seeds of grasses and fruit of plants have given way, abruptly, to a rocky mariage with glucose and fructose."

— Pollan, Michael. In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto, Paperback edition, page 114. Penguin Books.

"The human animal is adapted to, and apparently can thrive on, an extraordinary range of different diets, but the Western diet, however you define it, does not seem to be one of them."

— Pollan, Michael. In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto, Paperback edition, page 100. Penguin Books.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »